Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-11 14:42:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 94F5F9ECCCA7EA6D80CD9725B2DD44E3580335F7822435DC6AF820A4FC30ECB9
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The article linked to appears to back up the point made and noting the supposed track record of BBC Verify by linking to sources with their own agenda doesn’t help.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877444214218469500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 94F5F9ECCCA7EA6D80CD9725B2DD44E3580335F7822435DC6AF820A4FC30ECB9
  • createdAtMillis - 1736606525815
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187744421421846950094F5F9ECCCA7EA6D80CD9725B2DD44E3580335F7822435DC6AF820A4FC30ECB9