Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-10 22:28:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 564F5E2E2A65458F9C2F49C924E3E9B6AB0C2429ABCE46269C3DEEA5EBEAAE66
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The article linked to appears to back up the point made and noting the supposed track record of BBC Verify by linking to sources with their own agenda doesn’t help.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877444214218469500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 564F5E2E2A65458F9C2F49C924E3E9B6AB0C2429ABCE46269C3DEEA5EBEAAE66
  • createdAtMillis - 1736548098894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1877444214218469500564F5E2E2A65458F9C2F49C924E3E9B6AB0C2429ABCE46269C3DEEA5EBEAAE66