Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-10 03:21:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3EDB27FFA82D6C456C014DC311EC00F75259242F656A0FC1B6646DC1C6D1ECBB
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The article linked to appears to back up the point made and noting the supposed track record of BBC Verify by linking to sources with their own agenda doesn’t help.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877444214218469500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3EDB27FFA82D6C456C014DC311EC00F75259242F656A0FC1B6646DC1C6D1ECBB
  • createdAtMillis - 1736479297748
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18774442142184695003EDB27FFA82D6C456C014DC311EC00F75259242F656A0FC1B6646DC1C6D1ECBB