Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-10 08:37:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0DD24C949CBAEAC68BAAD3EBCE2E4F0CD006A01FCF60F4B5A0EF52EB9B8D5FC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The article linked to appears to back up the point made and noting the supposed track record of BBC Verify by linking to sources with their own agenda doesn’t help.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877444214218469500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0DD24C949CBAEAC68BAAD3EBCE2E4F0CD006A01FCF60F4B5A0EF52EB9B8D5FC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1736498268400
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18774442142184695000DD24C949CBAEAC68BAAD3EBCE2E4F0CD006A01FCF60F4B5A0EF52EB9B8D5FC9