Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-09 04:36:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3726D68C047026E3AAE7FACF83D67A1858C32BD5C9A18B7678A5A142D9453B8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Regardless of satire or not, the original claim holds more substantial evidence than verbal refutation. Verbal refutation is notoriously less reliable than physical evidence, especially if the claim is embarrassing for the one refuting. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence-legal/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877203775716270447
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3726D68C047026E3AAE7FACF83D67A1858C32BD5C9A18B7678A5A142D9453B8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1736397375656
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18772037757162704473726D68C047026E3AAE7FACF83D67A1858C32BD5C9A18B7678A5A142D9453B8F