Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-09 08:58:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28DFA619CA8505EF3C90F226EA1A0E19B988A15587D4D0557B6097345EE2D051
Participant Details

Original Note:

Regardless of satire or not, the original claim holds more substantial evidence than verbal refutation. Verbal refutation is notoriously less reliable than physical evidence, especially if the claim is embarrassing for the one refuting. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence-legal/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877203775716270447
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28DFA619CA8505EF3C90F226EA1A0E19B988A15587D4D0557B6097345EE2D051
  • createdAtMillis - 1736413139568
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187720377571627044728DFA619CA8505EF3C90F226EA1A0E19B988A15587D4D0557B6097345EE2D051