Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-09 07:38:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE53C6FFAD834F5DEA904EE5E260C266B5562800ACB85A3933FA9FC472E2635D
Participant Details

Original Note:

To NNN, it’s not factual. The statement “voted against a national inquiry” suggests a binary ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote on an amendment that specifically demanded an inquiry. This wasn’t the case. It included blocking other parts of the bill. It also only ‘called’ for an inquiry. https://t.co/nsJEfKvCRZ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877201358224502802
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE53C6FFAD834F5DEA904EE5E260C266B5562800ACB85A3933FA9FC472E2635D
  • createdAtMillis - 1736408289885
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1877201358224502802AE53C6FFAD834F5DEA904EE5E260C266B5562800ACB85A3933FA9FC472E2635D