Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-09 18:12:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 970A89E3F63968BB2470C8BDD5821ACBBB8A01F5D32A371E7A900677E7B6B5EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

To NNN, it’s not factual. The statement “voted against a national inquiry” suggests a binary ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote on an amendment that specifically demanded an inquiry. This wasn’t the case. It included blocking other parts of the bill. It also only ‘called’ for an inquiry. https://t.co/nsJEfKvCRZ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877201358224502802
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 970A89E3F63968BB2470C8BDD5821ACBBB8A01F5D32A371E7A900677E7B6B5EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1736446373862
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1877201358224502802970A89E3F63968BB2470C8BDD5821ACBBB8A01F5D32A371E7A900677E7B6B5EC