Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-09 06:13:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E28D4C2688A4A643D4978C1470E329E94171F67A34A6868349139C85600B59C
Participant Details

Original Note:

To NNN, it’s not factual. The statement “voted against a national inquiry” suggests a binary ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote on an amendment that specifically demanded an inquiry. This wasn’t the case. It included blocking other parts of the bill. It also only ‘called’ for an inquiry. https://t.co/nsJEfKvCRZ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877201358224502802
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E28D4C2688A4A643D4978C1470E329E94171F67A34A6868349139C85600B59C
  • createdAtMillis - 1736403214920
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18772013582245028025E28D4C2688A4A643D4978C1470E329E94171F67A34A6868349139C85600B59C