Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-09 07:52:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 34F842C065B01E48DC34505F8E50C9DC5096C41A23C0B853D85ED34A9E453DE8
Participant Details

Original Note:

To NNN, it’s not factual. The statement “voted against a national inquiry” suggests a binary ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote on an amendment that specifically demanded an inquiry. This wasn’t the case. It included blocking other parts of the bill. It also only ‘called’ for an inquiry. https://t.co/nsJEfKvCRZ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877201358224502802
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 34F842C065B01E48DC34505F8E50C9DC5096C41A23C0B853D85ED34A9E453DE8
  • createdAtMillis - 1736409165364
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187720135822450280234F842C065B01E48DC34505F8E50C9DC5096C41A23C0B853D85ED34A9E453DE8