Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-10 08:32:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C07C22B4967063C961CEB9468B399693E77370B262489D9DD7B44E14DB43A6A
Participant Details

Original Note:

To NNN, it’s not factual. The statement “voted against a national inquiry” suggests a binary ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote on an amendment that specifically demanded an inquiry. This wasn’t the case. It included blocking other parts of the bill. It also only ‘called’ for an inquiry. https://t.co/nsJEfKvCRZ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877201358224502802
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C07C22B4967063C961CEB9468B399693E77370B262489D9DD7B44E14DB43A6A
  • createdAtMillis - 1736497969068
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18772013582245028021C07C22B4967063C961CEB9468B399693E77370B262489D9DD7B44E14DB43A6A