Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-09 12:12:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F45D85D1027E08F351E5E001D6497F17E298D95618B5B7688D1E37D02A0D8AED
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Even though the amendment wouldn't legally force an inquiry, the political statement made by voting against this recommendation still holds weight, in the pursuit of justice against "grooming gangs," and in a time of high scrutiny should be addressed with immediate action.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877130027051135292
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F45D85D1027E08F351E5E001D6497F17E298D95618B5B7688D1E37D02A0D8AED
  • createdAtMillis - 1736424756893
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1877130027051135292F45D85D1027E08F351E5E001D6497F17E298D95618B5B7688D1E37D02A0D8AED