Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-08 20:49:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0662EEEE9A7470565DF35623B15D108933204F312D6D70EE86F2B07DEA492639
Participant Details

Original Note:

A afirmação está errada porque a Meta não abandonou completamente os especialistas. O sistema de "Notas da Comunidade" complementa o processo, mas as parcerias com checadores de fatos continuam em muitos países. Comparar isso a uma cirurgia médica é impreciso e sensacionalista. https://g1.globo.com/tecnologia/noticia/2025/01/07/meta-sistema-de-checagem-de-fatos-e-notas-de-comunidade-como-no-x.ghtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877075653985710339
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0662EEEE9A7470565DF35623B15D108933204F312D6D70EE86F2B07DEA492639
  • createdAtMillis - 1736369344291
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18770756539857103390662EEEE9A7470565DF35623B15D108933204F312D6D70EE86F2B07DEA492639