Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-08 17:43:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B96138DAB7256DF80F064ED63D28388187294B708F0B825B657C541CE25EEAB9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The closest source for this claim states "For a simple conversation of 20-50 questions, the water consumed is equivalent to a 500ml bottle" As a response can have hundreds of words, and even this source is biased against ChatGPT, the post's claim is likely far too high https://earth.org/environmental-impact-chatgpt/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1877045585070666110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B96138DAB7256DF80F064ED63D28388187294B708F0B825B657C541CE25EEAB9
  • createdAtMillis - 1736358184557
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1877045585070666110B96138DAB7256DF80F064ED63D28388187294B708F0B825B657C541CE25EEAB9