Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-08 14:53:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D55F4D56EBC5E90240930A7637555C1700E62E68954EC5541788056F0F2ABF88
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Wikipedia is a known unreliable source https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Wikipedia-considered-an-unreliable-source-for-academics-when-the-articles-cite-sources

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876921511350600180
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D55F4D56EBC5E90240930A7637555C1700E62E68954EC5541788056F0F2ABF88
  • createdAtMillis - 1736348026373
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1876921511350600180D55F4D56EBC5E90240930A7637555C1700E62E68954EC5541788056F0F2ABF88