Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-08 08:09:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48A5C2B2973E962184B72A86180A8CE96F76C55232E4E547980E04AD0E5D22CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Several studies have shown that community notes are considered more trustworthy than top down fact checking. Posts with a note also tend to be spread around far less, if not outright deleted. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2818054 https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/3/7/pgae217/7686087?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876838907708596543
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48A5C2B2973E962184B72A86180A8CE96F76C55232E4E547980E04AD0E5D22CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1736323781510
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187683890770859654348A5C2B2973E962184B72A86180A8CE96F76C55232E4E547980E04AD0E5D22CD