Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-11 19:25:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B0ACD838D2A95D5C1EA75D20FCA2B15B96B6E2CE5DA7F6F4B7AB720E657D0EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The note above is asserting the allegations are correct, when even the prosecution couldn't manage to build a case on them. At best it's speculation, until proven otherwise.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876802620280742382
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B0ACD838D2A95D5C1EA75D20FCA2B15B96B6E2CE5DA7F6F4B7AB720E657D0EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1736623538792
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18768026202807423828B0ACD838D2A95D5C1EA75D20FCA2B15B96B6E2CE5DA7F6F4B7AB720E657D0EA