Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-08 13:35:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FBE4EB322F119BA73E0A710E22EE04D80E7CC4C0B804B3B992F09055D33FC1A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Zuckerberg disse, erroneamente, sobre a existência de “tribunais secretos”, não decisões sigilosas como confunde o autor. Como se sabe, o tribunal é o STF, e as decisões são sigilosas para garantir a efetividade das decisões como permitido pelo art 189 do CPC. https://www.tjdft.jus.br/consultas/jurisprudencia/jurisprudencia-em-temas/direito-constitucional/a-publicidade-dos-atos-processuais-e-a-garantia-a-tramitacao-em-segredo-de-justica

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876788838493766011
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FBE4EB322F119BA73E0A710E22EE04D80E7CC4C0B804B3B992F09055D33FC1A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1736343336543
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1876788838493766011FBE4EB322F119BA73E0A710E22EE04D80E7CC4C0B804B3B992F09055D33FC1A8