Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-07 16:49:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9BD0233F95B53F9AC7829B96D148D9B688C0C81B1B6A5D778E5B44DE0089E6FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Piers' claims misrepresent court findings. 1. court ruled witnesses conflicted w/ contemporaneous school records, which were weighed more heavily. 2. Covert recordings deemed hearsay by legal standards, not deemed "false." Defamation burden of proof is on the defense https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Hijazi-v-Yaxley-Lennon-judgment-220721.pdf"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876650929820148178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9BD0233F95B53F9AC7829B96D148D9B688C0C81B1B6A5D778E5B44DE0089E6FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1736268555603
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18766509298201481789BD0233F95B53F9AC7829B96D148D9B688C0C81B1B6A5D778E5B44DE0089E6FA