Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-07 19:29:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21956AAABB68EBB96F2355DE82F4E04D5EFC438A57C9ED3301997F6F22C6AAC3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Piers' claims misrepresent court findings. 1. court ruled witnesses conflicted w/ contemporaneous school records, which were weighed more heavily. 2. Covert recordings deemed hearsay by legal standards, not deemed "false." Defamation burden of proof is on the defense https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Hijazi-v-Yaxley-Lennon-judgment-220721.pdf"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876650929820148178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21956AAABB68EBB96F2355DE82F4E04D5EFC438A57C9ED3301997F6F22C6AAC3
  • createdAtMillis - 1736278198302
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187665092982014817821956AAABB68EBB96F2355DE82F4E04D5EFC438A57C9ED3301997F6F22C6AAC3