Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-07 16:42:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB5A309B7CF347F4E62C50A7F3AED3F1E6D5A3F8786B0AC280BA8F46819CE978
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most psychologists do not read Freud. Historian of science C. Glymour notes that Freudian psychoanalysis is "widely regarded as a marginal science, and regarded by many as a full-fledged pseudoscience[...] Freud has been debunked often enough." https://kilthub.cmu.edu/articles/journal_contribution/How_Freud_left_Science/6491957/1/files/11936183.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876513744114573386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB5A309B7CF347F4E62C50A7F3AED3F1E6D5A3F8786B0AC280BA8F46819CE978
  • createdAtMillis - 1736268149328
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1876513744114573386DB5A309B7CF347F4E62C50A7F3AED3F1E6D5A3F8786B0AC280BA8F46819CE978