Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-08 16:09:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EC5FC46F2B0C6B70D59D90B3F47D4EEE994D97FA3B2546B50F358EAC18CBCEB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most psychologists do not read Freud. Historian of science C. Glymour notes that Freudian psychoanalysis is "widely regarded as a marginal science, and regarded by many as a full-fledged pseudoscience[...] Freud has been debunked often enough." https://kilthub.cmu.edu/articles/journal_contribution/How_Freud_left_Science/6491957/1/files/11936183.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876513744114573386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EC5FC46F2B0C6B70D59D90B3F47D4EEE994D97FA3B2546B50F358EAC18CBCEB
  • createdAtMillis - 1736352559909
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18765137441145733861EC5FC46F2B0C6B70D59D90B3F47D4EEE994D97FA3B2546B50F358EAC18CBCEB