Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-06 03:18:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6C0C384620E88C4FF90A8418BFD76DA0E6997CF621C808B5C57A518BFCF7DC7A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a factually correct claim. The evidence is located here: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Judgments/sentencing-remarks-r-v-dogar-others.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876053551610564823
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6C0C384620E88C4FF90A8418BFD76DA0E6997CF621C808B5C57A518BFCF7DC7A
  • createdAtMillis - 1736133522832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18760535516105648236C0C384620E88C4FF90A8418BFD76DA0E6997CF621C808B5C57A518BFCF7DC7A