Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-06 03:27:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B769D2B5E97080A4BF9DF49C3BFEB871E379A44C560758DEB6752180F4D9868
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a factually correct claim. The evidence is located here: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Judgments/sentencing-remarks-r-v-dogar-others.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876053551610564823
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B769D2B5E97080A4BF9DF49C3BFEB871E379A44C560758DEB6752180F4D9868
  • createdAtMillis - 1736134078585
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18760535516105648235B769D2B5E97080A4BF9DF49C3BFEB871E379A44C560758DEB6752180F4D9868