Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-05 15:57:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1DF2EBFF64E6FF6E9864AB0A46CC010F97BA4B4C95EA9CE2E58B81C8E42D499
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the facts in the post are accurate. The proposed note contains no more information about this case and links to generic Wikipedia and aclu articles on presumption of innocence and racial profiling, which are opinions that should be expressed as a comment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875878368735830441
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1DF2EBFF64E6FF6E9864AB0A46CC010F97BA4B4C95EA9CE2E58B81C8E42D499
  • createdAtMillis - 1736092646540
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1875878368735830441F1DF2EBFF64E6FF6E9864AB0A46CC010F97BA4B4C95EA9CE2E58B81C8E42D499