Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-06 06:26:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DAE82E24341E97B8EF2CB0EA92B9A7060792368077CD0BB61F985A57BA4C3C01
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the facts in the post are accurate. The proposed note contains no more information about this case and links to generic Wikipedia and aclu articles on presumption of innocence and racial profiling, which are opinions that should be expressed as a comment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875878368735830441
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DAE82E24341E97B8EF2CB0EA92B9A7060792368077CD0BB61F985A57BA4C3C01
  • createdAtMillis - 1736144802762
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1875878368735830441DAE82E24341E97B8EF2CB0EA92B9A7060792368077CD0BB61F985A57BA4C3C01