Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-05 15:10:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7EE9E4A9F1AF58905ADC5C552933F95B3D94C01F0A103F8CDF9D8355C6EE0AE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the facts in the post are accurate. The proposed note contains no more information about this case and links to generic Wikipedia and aclu articles on presumption of innocence and racial profiling, which are opinions that should be expressed as a comment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875878368735830441
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7EE9E4A9F1AF58905ADC5C552933F95B3D94C01F0A103F8CDF9D8355C6EE0AE7
  • createdAtMillis - 1736089845772
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18758783687358304417EE9E4A9F1AF58905ADC5C552933F95B3D94C01F0A103F8CDF9D8355C6EE0AE7