Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-06 01:23:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 76543D4EF35924115E97E67CF8D0ECC62AB13765EADE65CFC6670511E65B9BAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the facts in the post are accurate. The proposed note contains no more information about this case and links to generic Wikipedia and aclu articles on presumption of innocence and racial profiling, which are opinions that should be expressed as a comment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875878368735830441
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 76543D4EF35924115E97E67CF8D0ECC62AB13765EADE65CFC6670511E65B9BAF
  • createdAtMillis - 1736126607610
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187587836873583044176543D4EF35924115E97E67CF8D0ECC62AB13765EADE65CFC6670511E65B9BAF