Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-05 22:27:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 19A4F1D41E188F8C9D00975F0EB90913A6DE48EE2272FF7F23B448C2F97C1FA9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the facts in the post are accurate. The proposed note contains no more information about this case and links to generic Wikipedia and aclu articles on presumption of innocence and racial profiling, which are opinions that should be expressed as a comment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875878368735830441
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 19A4F1D41E188F8C9D00975F0EB90913A6DE48EE2272FF7F23B448C2F97C1FA9
  • createdAtMillis - 1736116032864
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187587836873583044119A4F1D41E188F8C9D00975F0EB90913A6DE48EE2272FF7F23B448C2F97C1FA9