Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-06 08:15:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0AA3616D530859FCF0345266C2B88D2167D3EC3BB1C643C340FC6DEEAFD2A9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Canadian Digital Media Research Network concluded: "Despite this significant speculation and associated accusations, we find no evidence that indicates a political party or foreign entity employed this bot network for political purposes." https://www.cdmrn.ca/publications/bot-campaign/ppfinaldebrief

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875745816230465583
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0AA3616D530859FCF0345266C2B88D2167D3EC3BB1C643C340FC6DEEAFD2A9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1736151348755
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1875745816230465583C0AA3616D530859FCF0345266C2B88D2167D3EC3BB1C643C340FC6DEEAFD2A9B