Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 13:29:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1BD69B0FF226F347C245BB153E79E145EDDCDBF8D10A77D4BAD10AB0C3D264D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: Der “Twitter” Algorithmus hat zuletzt vor 2 Jahren ein Update erhalten, zu dem Zeitpunkt als er veröffentlicht wurde. Eine Studie der QUT findet zumindest Hinweise darauf, dass Posts von Musk anders behandelt werden. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/253211/1/A_computational_analysis_of_potential_algorithmic_bias_on_platform_X_during_the_2024_US_election-4.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875534402001813623
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1BD69B0FF226F347C245BB153E79E145EDDCDBF8D10A77D4BAD10AB0C3D264D
  • createdAtMillis - 1735997347010
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1875534402001813623C1BD69B0FF226F347C245BB153E79E145EDDCDBF8D10A77D4BAD10AB0C3D264D