Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 15:12:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83AC36268BD2038932FFFE604017CB422C3E58F4020C3F7B4BB621AF4308C637
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: Der “Twitter” Algorithmus hat zuletzt vor 2 Jahren ein Update erhalten, zu dem Zeitpunkt als er veröffentlicht wurde. Eine Studie der QUT findet zumindest Hinweise darauf, dass Posts von Musk anders behandelt werden. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/253211/1/A_computational_analysis_of_potential_algorithmic_bias_on_platform_X_during_the_2024_US_election-4.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875534402001813623
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83AC36268BD2038932FFFE604017CB422C3E58F4020C3F7B4BB621AF4308C637
  • createdAtMillis - 1736003543989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187553440200181362383AC36268BD2038932FFFE604017CB422C3E58F4020C3F7B4BB621AF4308C637