Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 23:16:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21BA4F4D2CA3979349D1ED4A06070C61E6AABA1F51FD9FA55440F3920771031E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: Der “Twitter” Algorithmus hat zuletzt vor 2 Jahren ein Update erhalten, zu dem Zeitpunkt als er veröffentlicht wurde. Eine Studie der QUT findet zumindest Hinweise darauf, dass Posts von Musk anders behandelt werden. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/253211/1/A_computational_analysis_of_potential_algorithmic_bias_on_platform_X_during_the_2024_US_election-4.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875534402001813623
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21BA4F4D2CA3979349D1ED4A06070C61E6AABA1F51FD9FA55440F3920771031E
  • createdAtMillis - 1736032577665
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187553440200181362321BA4F4D2CA3979349D1ED4A06070C61E6AABA1F51FD9FA55440F3920771031E