Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 20:34:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DD34B391E019EB7EFBF791C7AB88E87D83F9FED6BDC6D956ACFDFEE19113EC4
Participant Details

Original Note:

El árbitro NO detalla que el balón estuviese parado porque el balón estaba en juego, en una disputa de Camavinga. El autor del post está dando a entender que lo hace para beneficiar al Real Madrid y reducir la sanción a su jugador Vinicius. https://x.com/JuandaRM7/status/1875462230583734357?t=0qyPfOrFV8IRzaUGo2Lz5g&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875477593832525952
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4DD34B391E019EB7EFBF791C7AB88E87D83F9FED6BDC6D956ACFDFEE19113EC4
  • createdAtMillis - 1736022862625
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18754775938325259524DD34B391E019EB7EFBF791C7AB88E87D83F9FED6BDC6D956ACFDFEE19113EC4