Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 12:40:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 08A071C42FB60C2B33B9BF9428EB2114A01B33D18194EE6829DBB9988A7E31A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

El árbitro NO detalla que el balón estuviese parado porque el balón estaba en juego, en una disputa de Camavinga. El autor del post está dando a entender que lo hace para beneficiar al Real Madrid y reducir la sanción a su jugador Vinicius. https://x.com/JuandaRM7/status/1875462230583734357?t=0qyPfOrFV8IRzaUGo2Lz5g&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875477593832525952
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 08A071C42FB60C2B33B9BF9428EB2114A01B33D18194EE6829DBB9988A7E31A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1735994455065
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187547759383252595208A071C42FB60C2B33B9BF9428EB2114A01B33D18194EE6829DBB9988A7E31A4