Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 15:03:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA1E286EC4E5DF9515C0D08FA1ED9082A7C3B6F963E7EDD8E3D3A19B8B13017C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: While the linked tweet does start by saying she is misquoted, the long reply does still say the same thing. There is possibly a very limited nuanced difference between, "the findings of the previous enquiry haven't been implemented" and "previous enquiries have gone nowhere"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875307107030872375
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA1E286EC4E5DF9515C0D08FA1ED9082A7C3B6F963E7EDD8E3D3A19B8B13017C
  • createdAtMillis - 1736003016695
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1875307107030872375FA1E286EC4E5DF9515C0D08FA1ED9082A7C3B6F963E7EDD8E3D3A19B8B13017C