Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 11:29:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6F9DC210A9BFAEFA0957AE5AFF9CF88CBF4D6E7CC6C62320F74FAC9148AE23F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: While the linked tweet does start by saying she is misquoted, the long reply does still say the same thing. There is possibly a very limited nuanced difference between, "the findings of the previous enquiry haven't been implemented" and "previous enquiries have gone nowhere"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875307107030872375
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F6F9DC210A9BFAEFA0957AE5AFF9CF88CBF4D6E7CC6C62320F74FAC9148AE23F
  • createdAtMillis - 1735990158834
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1875307107030872375F6F9DC210A9BFAEFA0957AE5AFF9CF88CBF4D6E7CC6C62320F74FAC9148AE23F