Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 20:21:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B690F3D4C6B6545BD734763F3ECD497C14AF5A8D52F60DE345B4E7F8A4600AFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

As the paper itself states, this is a theoretical analysis of how to approximate such models. They don't claim to have "figured it out". The post is misleading and could be read as if they reverse engineered or found some internal information. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14135

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875271207903236369
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B690F3D4C6B6545BD734763F3ECD497C14AF5A8D52F60DE345B4E7F8A4600AFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1736022089688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1875271207903236369B690F3D4C6B6545BD734763F3ECD497C14AF5A8D52F60DE345B4E7F8A4600AFB