Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 21:34:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF280D78ED58808D1479CD3AA653965EFE86D33C9A1179C3D9530E3B0FF07F72
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le faible taux de fraude ou d'abus détecté ne permet absolument pas de conclure qu'il n'y en a pas ou peu. La conclusion de la note est donc totalement abusive. C'est pourtant de la logique de base ...

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875256927111815518
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF280D78ED58808D1479CD3AA653965EFE86D33C9A1179C3D9530E3B0FF07F72
  • createdAtMillis - 1735940060645
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1875256927111815518EF280D78ED58808D1479CD3AA653965EFE86D33C9A1179C3D9530E3B0FF07F72