Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 19:25:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C695BEF582C2139D5B83B2FD4A96979D41F0118AD89543C76AB59B6B2A4E7C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le faible taux de fraude ou d'abus détecté ne permet absolument pas de conclure qu'il n'y en a pas ou peu. La conclusion de la note est donc totalement abusive. C'est pourtant de la logique de base ...

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875256927111815518
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C695BEF582C2139D5B83B2FD4A96979D41F0118AD89543C76AB59B6B2A4E7C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1736018745344
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18752569271118155182C695BEF582C2139D5B83B2FD4A96979D41F0118AD89543C76AB59B6B2A4E7C4