Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 17:20:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E74118F041A1EEF21829C08C73B0C1770F557B8BEA0798366F57E0E30460F53
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was not ignored by the BBC : https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4xnv02nr0o.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875228099425534316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E74118F041A1EEF21829C08C73B0C1770F557B8BEA0798366F57E0E30460F53
  • createdAtMillis - 1735924829714
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18752280994255343166E74118F041A1EEF21829C08C73B0C1770F557B8BEA0798366F57E0E30460F53