Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 17:45:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5FDB31DAE3264C244602584228DA784F1BA5456183257DFA3F04F9EA05A84AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Prudent Juniper Dove is correct about the contempt charge, if you read on in the same article that this user shared, you will see that the contempt charge was, indeed, for just repeating the claim that girls were being abused. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c704eedkqkvo

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875149756441207267
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5FDB31DAE3264C244602584228DA784F1BA5456183257DFA3F04F9EA05A84AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1735926343418
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1875149756441207267F5FDB31DAE3264C244602584228DA784F1BA5456183257DFA3F04F9EA05A84AE