Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 18:33:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61F6E4C487B9EE9CD5319EE2CC4866137CDF284CE8BBECA690623E090B297FD2
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Prudent Juniper Dove is correct about the contempt charge, if you read on in the same article that this user shared, you will see that the contempt charge was, indeed, for just repeating the claim that girls were being abused. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c704eedkqkvo

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875149756441207267
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61F6E4C487B9EE9CD5319EE2CC4866137CDF284CE8BBECA690623E090B297FD2
  • createdAtMillis - 1735929204079
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187514975644120726761F6E4C487B9EE9CD5319EE2CC4866137CDF284CE8BBECA690623E090B297FD2