Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 13:42:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58515EF4581218AEA687B8E298800337E1D2C973B5F7599A33ABDA79E20F7C3B
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Prudent Juniper Dove is correct about the contempt charge, if you read on in the same article that this user shared, you will see that the contempt charge was, indeed, for just repeating the claim that girls were being abused. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c704eedkqkvo

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875149756441207267
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58515EF4581218AEA687B8E298800337E1D2C973B5F7599A33ABDA79E20F7C3B
  • createdAtMillis - 1735998175091
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187514975644120726758515EF4581218AEA687B8E298800337E1D2C973B5F7599A33ABDA79E20F7C3B