Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 12:07:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F0F941A6E154CA2F1223520AEAB5C722AC9813E8A1B833E01D22A4473872427
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Prudent Juniper Dove is correct about the contempt charge, if you read on in the same article that this user shared, you will see that the contempt charge was, indeed, for just repeating the claim that girls were being abused. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c704eedkqkvo

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875149756441207267
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F0F941A6E154CA2F1223520AEAB5C722AC9813E8A1B833E01D22A4473872427
  • createdAtMillis - 1735906052786
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18751497564412072672F0F941A6E154CA2F1223520AEAB5C722AC9813E8A1B833E01D22A4473872427