Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 12:28:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17139D5D23836C0DD40D792DC13E6AFDAF6107A891E2EF347DF486FC3C011B9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Prudent Juniper Dove is correct about the contempt charge, if you read on in the same article that this user shared, you will see that the contempt charge was, indeed, for just repeating the claim that girls were being abused. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c704eedkqkvo

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875149756441207267
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17139D5D23836C0DD40D792DC13E6AFDAF6107A891E2EF347DF486FC3C011B9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1735907307077
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187514975644120726717139D5D23836C0DD40D792DC13E6AFDAF6107A891E2EF347DF486FC3C011B9A