Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 17:16:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 324A16C53881B6C6899109D3E9566F9C10C075F42D5DC12194726B2CDF4C77DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Daniel Lacalle no es un indicador fiable, no sólo por su continua simpatía e incluso afiliación al principal partido de la oposición, el PP, sino también porque se ha equivocado en numerosas ocasiones con sus previsiones y datos. https://www.elmundo.es/economia/2020/03/31/5e824ee121efa0e0298b45e7.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875124707369845176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 324A16C53881B6C6899109D3E9566F9C10C075F42D5DC12194726B2CDF4C77DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1735924577025
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1875124707369845176324A16C53881B6C6899109D3E9566F9C10C075F42D5DC12194726B2CDF4C77DA