Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 19:30:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6688347A003C6C04A507BB4121BC632236625B4DC6C869202F2D9F515E03398
Participant Details

Original Note:

The men "walked free" because there was no evidence against them. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7057539/Forensic-analyst-claims-investigator-presented-biased-evidence-Charlene-Downes-murder-case.html https://blackpoolcrime.wordpress.com/2021/06/01/the-murder-of-charlene-downes-the-ipcc-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875122086387064943
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6688347A003C6C04A507BB4121BC632236625B4DC6C869202F2D9F515E03398
  • createdAtMillis - 1735932652346
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1875122086387064943C6688347A003C6C04A507BB4121BC632236625B4DC6C869202F2D9F515E03398