Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-04 00:12:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 94E4D62FE0467C100A59E16AC030E454E5DC5942C86B874C5159E759DC1D1017
Participant Details

Original Note:

The men "walked free" because there was no evidence against them. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7057539/Forensic-analyst-claims-investigator-presented-biased-evidence-Charlene-Downes-murder-case.html https://blackpoolcrime.wordpress.com/2021/06/01/the-murder-of-charlene-downes-the-ipcc-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1875122086387064943
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 94E4D62FE0467C100A59E16AC030E454E5DC5942C86B874C5159E759DC1D1017
createdAtMillis - 1735949541656
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 187512208638706494394E4D62FE0467C100A59E16AC030E454E5DC5942C86B874C5159E759DC1D1017