Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 04:42:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E203D2C2B9A9DC66F9A87C84EC4A89BD3C1FEA06EA0B967098771BE2CBFBCF16
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source cited in the initial CN is suspect at best. Note it's donors at bottom of source in 1st CN, fact-checkers fact-checking themselves, etc. https://nypost.com/2021/05/18/how-facebook-uses-fact-checking-to-suppress-scientific-truth/ https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2019/the-ifcn-concludes-investigation-about-science-feedback/ https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/science-feedback/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378365309_Fact-check_of_Science_Feedback's_alleged_fact-check_by_CERES-Science There are more...

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1875038903536632125
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E203D2C2B9A9DC66F9A87C84EC4A89BD3C1FEA06EA0B967098771BE2CBFBCF16
  • createdAtMillis - 1735879366134
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1875038903536632125E203D2C2B9A9DC66F9A87C84EC4A89BD3C1FEA06EA0B967098771BE2CBFBCF16